Skoal and Copenhagen: Chewing tobacco maker agrees to $5M settlement

U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Co. will pay $5 million to the family of a man who died of mouth cancer. He began chewing tobacco at 13 and died at age 42. The settlement is being reported as the first wrongful-death settlement won from a chewing tobacco company. Chewing tobacco manufactures largely escaped the large personal injury and wrongly death damage awards that staggered the tobacco industry a decade ago, in part, because of more conclusive evidence that cigarettes caused disease. It has always been recognized that chewing tobacco use carries significant health risks, and industry experts are predicting a flood of lawsuits in the wake of this settlement.

Spokesmen for Altria, which bought U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Co. last year, vowed there would be no more settlements. Interestingly, Altria is the parent of Phillip Morris USA, the nation’s largest cigarette maker.

It's being reported that U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Co. sent cards in the 1980s to minors thanking them for their purchases and offering free tobacco. Amazingly, the company even sent a can opener a child to assist that child with the opening of his chewing tobacco.

Chewing tobacco users who develop cancer frequently lose their tongues, and other parts of their mouths. Observers have noted it is a particularly horrific way to die.

 
 

HOW IS FAULT DETERMINED IN A MARYLAND CAR ACCIDENT CASE?

Police officers, claims adjuster, attorneys, judges and jurors all give their conclusions on who caused an accident. Obviously, the conclusions offered by judge or a jury are going to be conclusive, absent an appeal. But what set of rules guides...

The Top Five Things To Expect In A Personal Injury Case.

Whether you are dealing with a motor vehicle accident, a slip or trip and fall claim, or some other negligence based case, in any personal injury claim, obviously, there's going to be an accident, or an injury, or both. The injured person will...

What is an Alford Plea under Maryland Law?

Almost 50 years ago the US Supreme Court recognized that if certain criteria were met, a sentencing judge could accept a plea – in effect a de facto plea of guilty- from an individual who maintained they were, in fact, innocent. Alford plead...

WHAT IS CONSIDERED PERJURY UNDER MARYLAND LAW?

Maryland criminal law makes it a crime to knowingly and falsely make an affirmation of material fact under oath, or in affidavit authorized by law. The falsity must be given knowingly, and not be the product of surprise or confusion. Moreover, the...

IS IT A CRIME TO MAKE A BOMB THREAT IN MARYLAND?

Most of us are familiar with a prankster who pulls a file alarm. In post-911 Maryland, this conduct is not viewed as harmless fun. Section 9-504 of the Criminal Law Article makes it a crime to circulate or transmit to...

IS IT ILLEGAL TO HACK INTO A COMPUTER IN MARYLAND

Maryland law punishes the conduct that is informally known as “hacking”. Current law makes it a crime, standing alone, to gain access to someone else’s computer data, whether or not information is stolen. The law was...