Does it Matter if They Fixed the Problem After I got Injured?

This article addresses an evidentiary principle familiar to seasoned personal injury lawyers in Baltimore.

When repairs are made to an instrumentality that has caused an injury, that fact typically never comes out at trial.

Maryland law provides that "subsequent remedial measures" are not relevant [and therefore not admissible] to prove fault or liability. There are exceptions to this rule; evidence of subsequent repairs is admissible to show the defendant had notice; or control of the instrumentality; or to show what the applicable standard of care owed to the plaintiff [e.g. were Does it Matter if They Fixed the Problem After I got Injured? - Attorney Blog Baltimore MD - Criminal Defense, Personal Injury Lawyer - Eric T. Kirk - baltimore_personal_injury_accident_attorney_ii(1)reasonable precautions, later taken, something that reasonably should have been in place prior to the accident]. It seems like common sense that if someone wiped up a spill, or repaired a stair or railing, right after an individual was hurt, that should be evidence there was a problem. The law does not recognize this, and is perhaps counter-intuitive here. The opposite in fact is true. Evidence of a repair, offered to show there was a problem, is inadmissible. Some commentators have suggested the rationale is that allowing evidence of repair would discourage repair. The law of evidence is often complex. Premise liability cases are typically difficult to prove, and a crucial piece of evidence can often make a huge difference. If you have a premises liability claim, I'd suggest you consult with an experienced attorney.

I offer my Maryland clients a reduced attorney fee program for their personal injury claim. I offer a free case analysis, evaluation and strategy planning meeting to my clients. Contact me today to schedule a session. 410 591 2835.  I'd be happy to meet with you. 

When do I find out how much my personal injury case is worth?

In other volumes of these legal guides, I have discussed in great detail the various factors that go into evaluating and assigning a dollar value to a personal injury case. Those factors include the hard numbers that go into an economic damage...

HOW OFTEN SHOULD I CONTACT MY PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER?

A serious personal injury can significantly disrupt the victim’s life. There are the obvious ramifications of being injured in pain, and not being able to do the things one wants to and would normally do.  The injured person may not...

Dictionary of Legal Terms

DAMAGES Damages are the method by which the law quantifies the harm that results from an act of negligence. Money is a poor substitute for the pain  and loss associated with a personal injury, but it is the system of compensation that the...

Should I Go To Therapy After A Car Accident?

The answer to the question posed in the title is a simple one. A person injured in an automobile accident should do whatever the doctor that evaluates them tells them to do. If that advice includes surgery, then the individual should have surgery....

IF I DON'T GO TO THE DOCTOR DO I HAVE A CASE?

“I was in a car accident. Do I have a case if I did not go to a doctor” ? As a personal injury and accident attorney, this is a question that I see with surprising frequency. I’ve represented the victims of negligence and injured...

HOW MUCH WILL I GET FOR MY PERSONAL INJURY OR AUTO ACCIDENT CASE?

In other chapters in these guides, I've explored in a lot of detail the various factors that go into determining a fair range of value for the typical personal injury or motor vehicle accident case in Maryland. One of the most difficult, yet one...