Over the course of the last decade, I've published in excess of 700 articles in the areas of personal injury, criminal defense, workers' compensation and insurance disputes, generally. If you can't find what you're looking for, feel free to contact me to discuss the details of your case and learn how I can help.

Why Should Your Insurance Company Pay For Damages If You’re Not At Fault For A Baltimore Car Accident?

Your insurance company may be asked, after a motor vehicle accident, to cover three classes of loss:

  • The cost of repair to your vehicle
  • Incidental expenses such as the provision of a rental vehicle while your vehicle is being repaired
  • Medical and or wage loss benefits under personal injury protection [PIP]  coverage

The concern frequently raised by those injured at the hands of another in an automobile accident is that, if their insurance company pays for some or all of their losses, their premiums will go up, or they may be canceled outright.

In many instances, it just makes sense to use your insurance to pay for repairs to your vehicle, to obtain a rental car, and to initially compensate you for medical and lost wages.

An insurance company can consider an accident history in assessing rates or cancellations, but by law cannot consider a single PIP claim.

Why Should Your Insurance Company Pay For Damages If You're Not At Fault For A Baltimore Car Accident?

Damages to an automobile, or market value settlement of a total loss, are addressed under the collision coverage in a policy. Now, such claims would also be handled under the liability coverage of an at-fault person or driver. If both coverages exist, you may have an option of proceeding with one or the other. The advantage of using your insurance- your collision coverage- is often that of speed and convenience. However, you might have to pay, at least upfront, a deductible. There may be a delay as the liability insurance carrier investigates coverage and or liability issues, postponing the timely repair of your car.

In many instances securing compensation for out-of-pocket expenses as they occur, as opposed to at the conclusion of the case, is only possible by getting such reimbursement through your own carrier. For example if you have such coverage, it is often possible to obtain the use of a rental vehicle that the insurance company pays for directly while your car is being repaired. It may well be that such payments are the responsibility- ultimately- of the person to hit you. You may well have an identical claim against the person that caused the accident, but those claims can take years to resolve. That is of little solace if you are paying expensive car rental for an extended period. As Attorney Eric T. Kirk will tell you.

Finally, I’ve seen many individuals over the years who are reticent to use their personal injury protection benefits. This is coverage for lost wages and your medical expenses up to the policy limits -typically $2,500. PIP or personal injury protection is first-party coverage for which you pay premiums. As noted, an insurance company could not use a singular PIP claim to affect your rates. There is no reason not to use this coverage after an accident.

I’ve spent the better part of  a 25 year career battling insurance companies, to ensure fair compensation for those I represent. I’d be happy to take a complimentary look at your claim and offer my opinions and advice. Feel free to contact me today to schedule a discussion.